Konvensi Internasional tentang Perlindungan terhadap Semua Orang dari Tindakan Penghilangan Secara Paksa

  menandatangani dan meratifikasi
  menandatangani namun tak meratifikasi
  tak menandatangani maupun meratifikasi
JenisResolusi Majelis Umum Perserikatan Bangsa-BangsaDirancang29 Juni 2006[1]Ditandatangani6 Februari 2007[2]LokasiParisEfektif23 Desember 2010[2]Syarat32 ratifikasiPenanda tangan98[2]Pihak59[2]PenyimpanSekjen PBBBahasaArab, Tionghoa, Inggris, Prancis, Rusia, Spanyol

Konvensi Internasional tentang Perlindungan terhadap Semua Orang dari Tindakan Penghilangan Secara Paksa (bahasa Inggris: International Convention for the Protection of All Persons from Enforced Disappearance, (ICPAPED)) adalah sebuah instrumen hak asasi manusia internasional Perserikatan Bangsa-Bangsa yang bertujuan untuk mencegah penghilangan paksa sesuai dengan yang diartikan dalam hukum internasional, kejahatan melawan kemanusiaan.[3] Teks tersebut diadopsi oleh Majelis Umum Perserikatan Bangsa-Bangsa pada 20 Desember 2006 dan dibuka untuk ditandatangani pada 6 Februari 2007. Perjanjian tersebut diberlakukan pada 23 Desember 2010.[4] Hingga September 2018[update], 98 negara menandatangani konvensi tersebut dan 59 negara meratifikasinya.[2]

Referensi

  1. ^ Kesalahan pengutipan: Tag <ref> tidak sah; tidak ditemukan teks untuk ref bernama UN_A6153_page13
  2. ^ a b c d e "International Convention for the Protection of All Persons from Enforced Disappearance". UNTC. Diakses tanggal 2010-11-27. 
  3. ^ Preamble
  4. ^ "Iraq Paves Way for UN Treaty on Enforced Disappearance". United Nations. 2010-11-25. Diakses tanggal 2010-11-28. 

Pranala luar

  • Full text of the Convention
  • UN list of signatories and ratifications
  • International Coalition Against Enforced Disappearances
  • Procedural history and related documents on the International Convention for the Protection of All Persons from Enforced Disappearance in the Historic Archives of the United Nations Audiovisual Library of International Law
  • l
  • b
  • s
Instrumen hak asasi manusia internasional
Deklarasi, manifesto, dan resolusi
Perjanjian hukum internasional
Perjanjian regional
Putusan pengadilan
  • Handyside v. United Kingdom (1976)
  • Lovelace v. Canada (1981)
  • Young, James & Webster v. United Kingdom (1981)
  • Guerrero v. Colombia (1982)
  • Baboeram-Adhin v, Suriname (1985)
  • Velásquez-Rodríguez v. Honduras (1988)
  • Müller v. Switzerland (1988)
  • Kitok v. Sweden (1988)
  • K. v. Austria (1990)
  • Lubicon Lake Band v. Canada (1990)
  • Toonen v. Australia (1992)
  • Castells v. Spain (1992)
  • Open Door and Dublin Well Woman v. Ireland (1992)
  • Otto-Preminger-Institut v. Austria (1994)
  • McCann v. United Kingdom (1995)
  • Goodwin v. United Kingdom (1996)
  • Kelly v. United Kingdom (1997)
  • Osman v. United Kingdom (1998)
  • Güleç v. Turkey (1998)
  • Amnesty International v. Zambia (1999)
  • Avocats Sans Frontières v. Burundi (2000)
  • Forum of Conscience v. Sierra Leone (2000)
  • Union Nationale des Syndicate Autonomes du Senegal v. Senegal (2000)
  • Barrios Altos v. Peru (2001)
  • VgT v. Switzerland (2001)
  • Lawyers for Human Rights v. Swaziland (2002)
  • Pretty v. United Kingdom (2002)
  • SERAC v. Nigeria (2002)
  • Law Office of Ghazi Suleiman v. Sudan (2003)
  • Interights et al. v. Botswana (2003)
  • Centre for Minority Rights Development et al. v. Kenya (2003)
  • Purohit and Moore v. The Gambia (2003)
  • Curtis Francis Doebbler v. Sudan (2003)
  • Association Pour la Sauvegarde de la Paix au Burundi v. Tanzania and Others (2003)
  • Dem. Rep. Congo v. Burundi and Others (2003)
  • Krone Verlag v. Austria (2003)
  • Garaudy v. France (2003)
  • Broniowski v. Poland (2004)
  • Öneryıldız v. Turkey (2004)
  • Editions Plon (Societe) v. France (2004)
  • Chauvy v. France (2004)
  • Selisto v Finland (2004)
  • Von Hannover v. Germany (2004)
  • K.L. v. Peru (2005)
  • Almonacid-Arellano v. Chile (2006)
  • Open Society Justice Initiative v. Cameroon (2006)
  • Zimbabwe Human Rights NGO Forum v. Zimbabwe (2006)
  • Yildirim v. Austria (2007)
  • Behrami v. France (2007)
  • Rumpf v. Germany (2010)
  • A, B and C v. Ireland (2010)
  • Singh v. France (2011)
  • Gelman v. Uruguay (2011)
  • Interights v. Egypt (2011)
  • Association “21 December 1989” and Others v. Romania (2011)
  • Vejdeland v. Sweden (2012)
  • Sarayaku v. Ecuador (2012)
  • Länsman v. Finland (2013)
  • Câmpeanu v. Romania (2014)
  • Umuhoza v. Rwanda (2017)
  • E.S. v. Austria (2018)
  • M'Bala M'Bala v. France (2019)
  • Magyar Jeti Zrt v. Hungary (2019)
  • Konaté v. Burkina Faso (2020)
  • Rashkin v. Russia (2020)
  • Lilliendahl v. Iceland (2020)
  • Lhaka Honhat v. Argentina (2020)