Konvensi Perserikatan Bangsa-Bangsa Menentang Penyiksaan

Konvensi Perserikatan Bangsa-Bangsa Menentang Penyiksaan
Nama panjang:
  • Konvensi Menentang Penyiksaan dan Perlakuan atau Hukuman Lain yang Kejam, Tidak Manusiawi, dan Merendahkan Martabat Manusia
  partai negara
  negara yang menandatanganinya, namun tak meratifikasikannya
  negara yang tak menandatanganinya
JenisKonvensi HAM
Dirancang10 Desember 1984[1]
Ditandatangani4 Februari 1985[2]
LokasiNew York
Efektif26 Juni 1987[1]
Syarat20 ratifikasi[3]
Penanda tangan83[1]
Pihak164[1]
PenyimpanSekjen PBB[4]
BahasaArab, Tionghoa, Inggris, Prancis, Rusia dan Spanyol[5]
Convention against Torture di Wikisource

Konvensi Menentang Penyiksaan dan Perlakuan atau Penghukuman Lain yang Kejam, Tidak Manusiawi, atau Merendahkan Martabat Manusia[6] (bahasa Inggris: Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment), yang lebih umum disebut sebagai Konvensi Perserikatan Bangsa-Bangsa Menentang Penyiksaan (bahasa Inggris: United Nations Convention against Torture, UNCAT) adalah sebuah traktat hak asasi manusia internasional, di bawah naungan Perserikatan Bangsa-Bangsa, yang ditujukan untuk menghindari penyiksaan dan perlakuan atau hukuman lain yang kejam, tidak manusiawi, dan merendahkan martabat manusia di seluruh dunia. Konvensi tersebut mewajibkan negara-negara untuk mengambil tindakan efektif untuk menghindari penyiksaan di wilayah manapun yang berada di bawah yurisdiksi mereka, dan melarang negara-negara untuk mendeportasi seseorang ke suatu negara apabila terdapat alasan-alasan yang kuat untuk meyakini bahwa orang tersebut dapat menjadi korban penyiksaan di negara tersebut.

Referensi

  1. ^ a b c d "Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment". United Nations Treaty Collection. Diakses tanggal 2018-06-26. 
  2. ^ General Assembly resolution 40/128 (13 December 1985), Status of the Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment, A/RES/40/128, under 2.
  3. ^ Convention Against Torture Diarsipkan 9 November 2007 di Wayback Machine., Article 27. Retrieved on 30 December 2008.
  4. ^ Convention Against Torture Diarsipkan 9 November 2007 di Wayback Machine., Article 25. Retrieved on 30 December 2008.
  5. ^ Convention Against Torture Diarsipkan 9 November 2007 di Wayback Machine., Article 33. Retrieved on 30 December 2008.
  6. ^ "Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 5 Tahun 1998". 

Pranala luar

Wikisumber memiliki naskah asli yang berkaitan dengan artikel ini:
Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment
  • Official text of the Convention
  • List of parties Diarsipkan 2010-11-08 di Wayback Machine.
  • Optional Protocol
  • U.N. Committee against Torture
  • Human Rights Watch summary of the Convention
  • List of links to other related documents
  • Human Rights First; Tortured Justice: Using Coerced Evidence to Prosecute Terrorist Suspects (2008)
  • Human Rights First; Leave No Marks: Enhanced Interrogation Techniques and the Risk of Criminality
  • International Rehabilitation Council for Torture Victims (IRCT); What is torture? Defining torture Diarsipkan 2021-09-25 di Wayback Machine.
  • Introductory note by Hans Danelius, procedural history note and audiovisual material on the Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment in the Historic Archives of the United Nations Audiovisual Library of International Law
  • UN Convention against Torture (1984-2014) - Research Guide, UNOG Library
  • UN Convention against Torture (1984-2014) - Bibliography (Books/Articles), UNOG Library
Pengawasan otoritas Sunting ini di Wikidata
Umum
  • Integrated Authority File (Jerman)
  • VIAF
    • 1
  • WorldCat (via VIAF)
Perpustakaan nasional
  • Amerika Serikat
Lain-lain
  • Microsoft Academic
  • l
  • b
  • s
Instrumen hak asasi manusia internasional
Deklarasi, manifesto, dan resolusi
Perjanjian hukum internasional
Perjanjian regional
Putusan pengadilan
  • Handyside v. United Kingdom (1976)
  • Lovelace v. Canada (1981)
  • Young, James & Webster v. United Kingdom (1981)
  • Guerrero v. Colombia (1982)
  • Baboeram-Adhin v, Suriname (1985)
  • Velásquez-Rodríguez v. Honduras (1988)
  • Müller v. Switzerland (1988)
  • Kitok v. Sweden (1988)
  • K. v. Austria (1990)
  • Lubicon Lake Band v. Canada (1990)
  • Toonen v. Australia (1992)
  • Castells v. Spain (1992)
  • Open Door and Dublin Well Woman v. Ireland (1992)
  • Otto-Preminger-Institut v. Austria (1994)
  • McCann v. United Kingdom (1995)
  • Goodwin v. United Kingdom (1996)
  • Kelly v. United Kingdom (1997)
  • Osman v. United Kingdom (1998)
  • Güleç v. Turkey (1998)
  • Amnesty International v. Zambia (1999)
  • Avocats Sans Frontières v. Burundi (2000)
  • Forum of Conscience v. Sierra Leone (2000)
  • Union Nationale des Syndicate Autonomes du Senegal v. Senegal (2000)
  • Barrios Altos v. Peru (2001)
  • VgT v. Switzerland (2001)
  • Lawyers for Human Rights v. Swaziland (2002)
  • Pretty v. United Kingdom (2002)
  • SERAC v. Nigeria (2002)
  • Law Office of Ghazi Suleiman v. Sudan (2003)
  • Interights et al. v. Botswana (2003)
  • Centre for Minority Rights Development et al. v. Kenya (2003)
  • Purohit and Moore v. The Gambia (2003)
  • Curtis Francis Doebbler v. Sudan (2003)
  • Association Pour la Sauvegarde de la Paix au Burundi v. Tanzania and Others (2003)
  • Dem. Rep. Congo v. Burundi and Others (2003)
  • Krone Verlag v. Austria (2003)
  • Garaudy v. France (2003)
  • Broniowski v. Poland (2004)
  • Öneryıldız v. Turkey (2004)
  • Editions Plon (Societe) v. France (2004)
  • Chauvy v. France (2004)
  • Selisto v Finland (2004)
  • Von Hannover v. Germany (2004)
  • K.L. v. Peru (2005)
  • Almonacid-Arellano v. Chile (2006)
  • Open Society Justice Initiative v. Cameroon (2006)
  • Zimbabwe Human Rights NGO Forum v. Zimbabwe (2006)
  • Yildirim v. Austria (2007)
  • Behrami v. France (2007)
  • Rumpf v. Germany (2010)
  • A, B and C v. Ireland (2010)
  • Singh v. France (2011)
  • Gelman v. Uruguay (2011)
  • Interights v. Egypt (2011)
  • Association “21 December 1989” and Others v. Romania (2011)
  • Vejdeland v. Sweden (2012)
  • Sarayaku v. Ecuador (2012)
  • Länsman v. Finland (2013)
  • Câmpeanu v. Romania (2014)
  • Umuhoza v. Rwanda (2017)
  • E.S. v. Austria (2018)
  • M'Bala M'Bala v. France (2019)
  • Magyar Jeti Zrt v. Hungary (2019)
  • Konaté v. Burkina Faso (2020)
  • Rashkin v. Russia (2020)
  • Lilliendahl v. Iceland (2020)
  • Lhaka Honhat v. Argentina (2020)